what x pipe should I go with or should I go with prochamber

[351stroker]

i have a 351 bored to a 357 with edelbrock rpm heads and edelbrock perofmer rpm cam and trick flow intake i was looking to change up my exhaust would it be loud if i did


x pipe
with mac pro dumps

or

prochamber
with mac pro dumps

what way would be louder and if so if it is x what brand is recommeded

 

[85_SS_302_Coupe]

Dr. Gas X pipe > all other mid pipes.

 

[Mintsick]

I think the dumps are what is going to make it obnoxious personally, was never a fan of dumps really. If you had a full exhaust I'd say 100% x pipe.

 

[2000xp8]

Get the mac stuff, if you want to do it all over again in a few years.

Bassani SS x pipe.

Probably be just as loud both ways.
Just don't confuse loud with sounding good.
I'm with mint, if this is a street car, use a catback.

 

[Stormwalker]

Dr. Gas X pipe > all other mid pipes.

I'll 2nd this.

 

[fiveohwblow]

I second 2000 on the bassani. I have it and it's the best I've seen an heard so far

 

[MAC'n89Blckstng]

I've run VRS x pipes, everyone has had to be modified to go in but its a true x, bassani and magnaflow x pipes are a rounded off x. and put tailpipes behind those mac muffs, it will sound like sex.

 

[Mintsick]

Agree with tailpipes being a must, dumps have no tone just loud bass.

 

[85_SS_302_Coupe]

On the "true x" comment, this is why i run the Dr. Gas, plus because they invented the X pipe. Regardless, there are X pipes and then there are funny looking things that are marketed as being an X but have that big clamshell welded together thing in the middle...that to me is not an X and i have heard the difference. If it doesn't look like two 90 degree bends siamesed together in the middle then i wouldn't buy it...but that's my preference and your mileage may vary.