Which sub do you think?

Discussion in 'Mustang Sound & Shine All' started by TireSmoknWindsr, Jun 17, 2004.

Page 2 of 2

  1. damacman New Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 13, 2003
    Message Count:
    536
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    So, I guess the pair of HX2 18 inchers I have in my 2k3 Stang won't fit either . . . I have full access to my spare tire, the stock back seat, etc. Anyone want to put some money up on this? For the record, the overall diameter of a subwoofer has NOTHING to do with how good it will sound -- kind of like saying you can't get a big block to rev fast. There a multiple determining factors on how a subwoofer can sound in a vehicle, the enclosure being the single most important one of them.
    damacman, Jun 23, 2004
    #21

  2. Infinity Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 7, 2002
    Message Count:
    1,250
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Charlestown, IN

    :banana: EXACTLY the point I was making earlier in this thread! :nice:

    How did you fit the 18's in there (I don't remember an 18" HX2, but cool)? Are they running IB, or just small-sealed? I do believe you could actually port the trunk itself using drivers with that much displacement and tune it low enough to call elephants in the Serengeti. :hail2:
    Infinity, Jun 24, 2004
    #22

  3. 4.6LGT Banned

    Member Since:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Message Count:
    21
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    well I would have to go with 2 audiobahn 1200 Q series myself ( awesome subs) but if you are looking for best bang for the buck I would probably go with the fosgate because sony sucks. But the 15" should have better efficiency(put out more noise) than a 10" or 12" in the same series. But then again Rockford Fosgate has poor signal to noise ratio's to start with. I have two 10" fosgates to give a nice balance to my system and they sound good.
    4.6LGT, Jun 24, 2004
    #23

  4. damacman New Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 13, 2003
    Message Count:
    536
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Woofers do not have a signal to noise ratio . . . ? This is a measure of the difference between the signal and the noise level of an amplifier's output section and has no correlation to speakers.
    damacman, Jun 24, 2004
    #24

  5. damacman New Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 13, 2003
    Message Count:
    536
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Well, it does play ruler flat down to 15 hertz . . .

    Attached Files:

    damacman, Jun 24, 2004
    #25

  6. stealthpony New Member

    Member Since:
    May 25, 2003
    Message Count:
    48
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Wood River, IL
    :rlaugh: no no no if your going jl or anything at that go with the w6v2 or the w7 12". if you didnt know a w7 8" has been put against a audiobahn 12" flame q and the jl dominated it so there ya go. if ya want something that BEATS with BAD**S effeciancy go with JL W7V2 or W6V2.
    stealthpony, Jun 25, 2004
    #26

  7. Infinity Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 7, 2002
    Message Count:
    1,250
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Charlestown, IN
    I don't think he wants to spend that kind of change- hence the using of Sony or RF to begin with. But, I ALMOST agree with you. I like the w6v2's, but I don't like the w7's. Too enclosure sensitive. I would go for a RE XXX or an Adire Brahma, Elemental Ov2, IDMAX, Eclipse TiPro, TC Sounds 4hp, or some Funky Pups :banana: :banana: :banana:
    Infinity, Jun 25, 2004
    #27

  8. stealthpony New Member

    Member Since:
    May 25, 2003
    Message Count:
    48
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Wood River, IL
    yeah brahma is bad ass too :hail2:
    stealthpony, Jun 26, 2004
    #28
Page 2 of 2

Share This Page