Engine Bad engine shaking at idle

Yeah man that flywheel is a 50oz unit but it need to be resurfaced badly. The pressure plate has hot spots, the pilot bearing is junk, and the clutch plate is suspect as well.

I would take the flywheel to a machine shop and have them resurface it and get a clutch kit for it. That would never go back in one of my cars.
I should’ve mentioned I’ve already got brand new everything sitting in the house waiting to go in tomorrow or whenever weather permits. Everything seems to have been done in such a bad way it really makes me curious as to the life this car had before me.

Help! 78 II has no power to any electrical except headlights and taillights and hazards.

Here's something that might be helpful for you - was thinking about the harness that runs from the ignition module to the distributor and found that Painless offers a kit to install the Duraspark in older vehicles complete with a wiring diagram. I'm sure you can use it to decipher which wires are which to check them for continuity. :nice:

chrome-extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/https://www.painlessperformance.com/Manuals/30812.pdf

1706668541074.png
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Help! 78 II has no power to any electrical except headlights and taillights and hazards.

As I mentioned earlier, it wouldn't be a bad idea to check continuity of the circuits/connections I listed above to be sure there isn't a wire grounding itself out and preventing the signal from firing the coil. It could be as easy as a bad wire or bad ground keeping you from firing this thing up!

Engine Foxbody idle/throttle issues

Installation of cylinder heads and valve train:


Installation of lower intake:

  • Useful
Reactions: 1 user

Engine This guy needs the help of this forum

Hi all, I’m @b_arrington ’s son. We finished the continuity tests and I think we’ve figured it out! Long story short, we confirmed continuity to all pins and their intended sensors, except for pins 6 and 10. We were reading pin 10 as the ACT, and didn’t know what pin 6 went to because it should’ve been the ACT. We then realized that pin 10 should’ve been the CANP, but we don’t have one of those and so whoever put together the engine switched the ACT and CANP plugs. We confirmed this with another test after finding the CANP wire.
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: 5 users

Help! 78 II has no power to any electrical except headlights and taillights and hazards.

I really don't know why there is more than one connection like that, the idea just popped into my head this morning. :D It's possible that they made 2 to install 2 separate capacitors with different ratings? :shrug: Otherwise I'm at a loss.
The thick gauge yellow wire is spliced off the headlight wire but I still don't know why. Also, I took apart the distributor again and have good ground at the pickup coil so if it is the pick up coil, it's not a ground issue. Also, I confirmed the ignition coil is in fact good. No conclusive info but we are starting to eliminate parts of the circuit which is always good. I might buy a higher quality pickup coil because i did the test in the video you attached and I didn't get any beeping (continuity) but I might have done it wrong since it is a 3 prong connector.
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Fox Shaving engine bay, hood release?

I only partially shaved my engine bay and did a partial wire tuck. I am pretty sure i had the cable come out of the iriginal hole and then immediately routed it into the fender, but I will need to check. From there i ran it along the outside of the upper rail. You can kinda see it in this pic. I'll have to go doube check what hole it came through the firewall. I still have cruise so I doubt i used that hole for the cable.

View attachment 717479
Exactly this . Something is off with his routing . I’ve done 2-3 like that and no issue

Engine Bad engine shaking at idle

When you go do the throw out bearing it might actually be the pilot bearing which was an issue on another vehicle I obtained as it turned out that owner didnt stab the trans in straight and must of used the bolts to pull the transmission to the bellhousing because the roller bearing got pushed out of the bushing which gave zero support for the input shaft ....In the AP store the whole roller bearing/bushing assembly is $50 and just the roller bearing is $15...

In my case the TOB was good but had to replace the front input shaft bearing in the T-5 along with the pilot bearing..

Theres a special way to install the pilot bearing too if you buy the roller bearing alone as one side is slightly more open than the other to allow for slight installation misalignment...............

As for the flywheel ...If you happen to remove it take pictures of the backside of the flywheel .............Im curious like that & Thanks ..

Good Luck
As requested, here is a picture of the back of the flywheel and some pictures of the rest of the clutch assembly. I haven’t found anything out of the ordinary so far.
IMG_2397.jpeg

IMG_2399.jpeg

IMG_2401.jpeg

IMG_2403.jpeg

IMG_2404.jpeg

One thing is for certain though. I was definitely lied to about the clutch that was in the car. I was told it had a center force clutch in it and from what I’m seeing it looks to be a stock replacement clutch. Also the bell housing had no alignment dowels in it at all. I’ve got a guy local that’s got some spares I’ll be picking them up tomorrow.

Subframe differences... Scratch that... K-Member Koncerns

There are differences in the 88-93 4cyl k-members vs the V8. The 4cyl are narrower.

You can tell by the spring perch cups which one you have. Do you have a pic? It’s hard to describe but visually easy to tell.

More info here
Got hit with some snow this morning of course.

Subframe differences... Scratch that... K-Member Koncerns

Like said, the main differences between the 87-95 K-member and 96-04 K-member (aside from engine mounts) is the location of the 4 rear bolts on the small pad. You'll have to do some grinding/modification to get those to work.

Also, steering rack is about 1" higher on the 79-95 K-member. This may create a bumpsteer issue with 96+ spindles because the tie rod location should be 1" higher to compensate. Bumpsteer kits don't work in this situation because the tie rod end needs to move UP into the area where the tie rod spindle mount currently occupies.
Good to know, that is something i will have to keep an eye on. I have heard of bump-steer either being terrible or no big deal depending on severity so thats something guess ill just have to see myself. for anyone else ever wondering ive also found the suspension stuff is all useable as well, the control arms are 3/4 inch longer on the SN chassis, and the shock mounting side on the spindle side is a touch different but everything will bolt up especially if using the stock sn shock and a arms.
What an awesome community!

Filter