edelbrock rpm2, many questions..

jetuomi

Founding Member
Jan 30, 2002
1,464
0
0
Toronto, ON
I'm actually very curious about this intake, and so are some of my friends, so I figured I'll post.. what's the flow, rpm range, anyone using it? what heads would it mount best to, rpm's ?? etc, etc.. dyno graphs would be cool too !

tx
 
  • Sponsors (?)


stang_gt_1994 said:
Thats a no. I have heard that is is very close to the RPM 1st version.

from what I've read, its sick compared to the rpm1 north of 5000rpm, but I'd like to see a dyno chart, and, find out where to buy it from (not on summit, etc) and how much it cost that person to buy it, how the low rpm's are, etc..

:)
 
VIPERn94Five-0 said:
supposedly it pulls even better up top...and pulls even further


someone has it here, if only I could remember his USERID !!! its the guy with the 310 rear-wheel w/ stock t-body, or 65mm one? there was a huge argument lately where some guy was saying all 5.0's can make over 310 rear-wheel or something like that...... what's his name?? :bang:
haha
 
jetuomi said:
someone has it here, if only I could remember his USERID !!! its the guy with the 310 rear-wheel w/ stock t-body, or 65mm one? there was a huge argument lately where some guy was saying all 5.0's can make over 310 rear-wheel or something like that...... what's his name?? :bang:
haha
All 5.0s can make over 310rwhp with alot of $$$.
 
Nihilation said:
Talking bout me now? =p

YES!! how could I be so retarded and forget your name !!
anyways, talking with Ed Curtis, he saying go for the rpm2 intake, and I remembered you had one, can you repost that dyno graph again??

and, the whole argument was, he's the cheapest to make 310 so far that we've seen in a while.. or something like that.. haha
 
Here are both of my dyno sheets. SAE & STD(haha)...

294sae.jpg


301hp.jpg


Yes, it pulls HARD way past 6k RPM now that it's got a bigger TB. Not much pull under 3.5k, but over 4k it hauls ass.
 
Me too, I wanna know more first hand about it too. I need to switch to a performer rpm now! Im running a performer on my DSS 331 w/ AFr 185's. That thing is choking me like crazy. Considering switching to just an rpm upper (cheaper and easier) or spending the money on an RPM2. I just need to know if its worth the extra money.
 
17yrOldStanger said:
they did an article in the recent MM&FF mag. The cover has a canary yellow fox on it. Pick it up.

cool, got the mag, I'll check it out !! I always wonder why mustang dyno's peak off after 4k.. my friends maxima, the torque curve is flat all the way to 6500 rpm's !!!??? why can't stangs be like that? STILL, nice dyno NIH !!
 
jjd975 said:
Edelbrock designed it to be an option between the RPM and Victor intakes. In most cases its way more intake than a 302 needs.


Yea it goes
Performer
RPM
RPMII
Victor

The RPMII will make more power in the 5,000-6500 range over the regular RPM. Now it will depend on your set up whether you will need this much flow.
 
Weren't there some issues with the intake though? Maybe it was just because Nilahtion got his when they first came out, I think he was missing some parts.

And I don't remember, does the RPM2 fit under the stock hood?