Jackie Chan said:ugh...i love the ls1 and love the stang, but hate them together. thats like mixing grape jelly and fried chicken
Maybe you prefer spaghetti and meatball?mo_dingo said:Like lamb and tuna fish
Pokageek said:Car looks Nice..so here the question...
Our sn95's were not upgraded with the equivalent H/C/I as the chevys because torque sold the cars and Ford decided not persue more HP. So enthusiasts like us beefed up the H/C/I to modern day standards and they are putting out 300rwhp + n/a. Now that is equal to 360-380FWHP and around 400FWTQ. Then you have the LS1 rated at 305 FWHP and 335FWTQ..So what's the big deal about an LS1?
Pokageek said:Sounds like they are putting out more than advertised HP to me. Still, a H/C/I 5.0 can do 12's. Just because the stock LS1 gets H/C/I doesn't make it anymore facinating to me. The xtra cubes are nice though.
:Word:Low-5.0 said:Stock LS1's generally put down 280-300RWHP, so yeah they are underated.
bimmertech said::Word:
extremely underrated.
can my 302 make 100hp/liter n/a? hell no, but a LS1 can get damn close to it.
The LS1 has redefined the american V8 and ford has failed to produce comparable competition.
so to you LS1 swap into a fox guy
to ford for not making an updated 5.0/5.8 pushrod motor
Low-5.0 said:
Im only making approx. 77hp/liter n/a(449rwhp+18% drivetrain loss=530hp). Stupid LS1
No wait......Stupid Ford