1320stang
Founding Member
Well, to an extent, I think you can weed some out. The guy that is totally serious when he says Fords rule and everthing else sucks is not a ture car guy in my book. I think a true car guy appreciates other brands and other styles. A guy that only like the original cars, I don't care if he changes his own oil, and hates all modifications, not a true car guy. Same for the opposite. I dunno, I'm a detail guy, I really appreciate what goes into a car, be it a restoration or a highly modified piece. While I see why a guy might go out and buy a Honda, then order a bunch of parts out of a catalog, have them painted to match and put them on his car (been there in the original mini-truck craze), it can be done tastefully or it can be over the top. While that seems to parallel Preston's ride, you can't just go out and buy the parts to do what he required. I think there is one company that makes such pieces and I don't think they were intended for as low as his car is, or as fat of tires that are on his car. You might think of it as taking your sister to the dance contest at the prom, but if you win, you got it done. Yeah, you still have to take the ribbing from school, but you did win. It all is where your priorities lie. If the DeLays, Boyd or Foose did Preston's car, we'd all deem it as a failure due to the leve of fit and finish we're used to seeing out of them. But (and I'm saying it again) it's with what he had to work with and his experience that we're mainly basing how we judge his work here.
Here's another awesome example of a garage built project with little prior experience, but the difference is, this guy has a lot of coin AND he was copying an existing car.
http://members.aol.com/COUPECHUCK/
Here's another awesome example of a garage built project with little prior experience, but the difference is, this guy has a lot of coin AND he was copying an existing car.
http://members.aol.com/COUPECHUCK/