whitesnake1994 said:leave the ricer tails to the ricer cars... i thing they look soo GAY on mustangs
xc_myers_06 said:yea i was just posting to see opinions, i am a die-hardcore fan on the 94-95 style. It does tell that i am the last of the 5.0 series. Although the v6 has them too. I think they should make more changes between base and gt because their aren't too many visuals but i guess there are quite a few inside the car. In the end, i am all about the 94-95 lights but i don't mind the 96-98 stang lights because they are clear. I would like to get a 94-95 style that is clear
nc_stang_girl said:I like the 94/95 factories because there are so few 94/95 cars out there that are nice nowadays. But I do prefer the shinier look of the 96-98 tails; they seem to stand out more to me, with the reflective-like backing and all. I just changed out my 94/95 tails to the 96-98s. But I'm keeping my old tails in case I ever want to change back...
nmcgrawj said:U shoulda knew how this would turn out before even posting the poll. EVERYONE will go to the 94/95's...with a few going for the 96-98's. None for those ricer POS lights.
But i'll tell u one thing. If i went with clear lights up front, which i would never do on black, but IF i did, i would get the carbon fiber tail lights with the black bezels. They arent as "blingy" as those things up top....but yet...still dont look right. I will give the 96-98's one thing though, i like their "jewel" look. Their red lens looks much better than ours.
I'd take my 94/95 lights with the saleen bezels all dayyyyyyyy
WhiteStallionGT said:put your flame suite on
the 94-95 tails ARE something different!nc_stang_girl said:LOL...ok, I'm ready!
I just wanted something different...
whitesnake1994 said:leave the ricer tails to the ricer cars... i thing they look soo GAY on mustangs