According to this preposterous nitwit anyway. Wow.
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com//editorials/1101237418/
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com//editorials/1101237418/
article: Shifting Expectations
"My recent editorial “Death to the Stick Shift” questioned the safety of-- and slavish affection for-- manual transmissions. The main premise of my article was simple: it takes a higher level of driver attention to operate a manual transmission than an automatic.
This point was proven by my many critics, who argued that driving a stick shift prevents drivers from engaging in dangerous multi-tasking. This erstwhile advantage simply reinforces the assertion that a manual demands greater concentration (however subconscious). By the same token, it’s disingenuous to assert that an automatic transmission is inherently dangerous because it allows drivers to talk on their cell, eat, drink or otherwise distract themselves. Inattentive drivers are a hazard, no matter what kind of car they drive."
donjohn said:they guy actually has a bunch of articles on similar topics, one of them even is a response to this article where he says that automatics are just as dangerous b/c dangerous driver will just find another distraction... so i think there are more articles in this series we didn't read...