'94-'95 Repsect

Well....I stuck with mine as a base and made it pretty bad ass. There is something to having a 5.0 as that was what I grew up dreaming about owning one day. I know getting a turbo kit for it wasn't easy, but all the parts you could ever dream of needing are out ther for the '94-'95 cars, they just might be a little pricier at times. It's simple math, less demand = smaller production runs = greater costs bringing to market.
 
  • Sponsors (?)


I have seen the light recently at the true potentila of the 4.6L and needless to say I have a new found respect and desire to own one someday... it would have to be at least a 5.0 liter or better mod motor though! :) I'd still never give up my '95 5.0L pushrod stang though either.
 
Killercanary said:
I have seen the light recently at the true potentila of the 4.6L and needless to say I have a new found respect and desire to own one someday... it would have to be at least a 5.0 liter or better mod motor though! :) I'd still never give up my '95 5.0L pushrod stang though either.

plop a lightning engine in something :nice:
 
I love my car, i wouldnt trade it for any other mustang, not saying other years arent nice but ive driven an 05, it wasnt bad but i wasnt all that thrilled, ive driven older mustangs and they were nice but my car is just comfy and its just me, i got asked so often by my family when i first bought my car, "so why did you get THAT mustang? its almost 11 years old, its got over 70k miles, and your a girl, what would you want with that?" Now when they hear me before they see me, and they see how much different its looking its more like "oh your car looks so good, your car sounds so good, thats so awesome that your a girl and you have that car" i just smile and shake my head.
 
sociopath5.0 said:
Based on lack of respect I would have to say the Mustang II is the least desirable and respected. I hate they even have the Mustang name attached to them.
It is worth remembering, though, that without the Mustang II there is a good chance that we wouldn't have Mustangs today. Or at least, not a continuous unbroken line of them. It was the right car for Ford to build at the time, and it sold quite well, especially in the first couple of years.

Dave
 
Rootus said:
It is worth remembering, though, that without the Mustang II there is a good chance that we wouldn't have Mustangs today. Or at least, not a continuous unbroken line of them. It was the right car for Ford to build at the time, and it sold quite well, especially in the first couple of years.

Dave

:Word:
 
ProKiller said:
i love the 94-95s but you mean to tell me that if somebody pulled up to at a light and handed u the keys and title to 67' GT500 you wouldn't take it?


What can I get for it on Ebay?:D

It'd have to be a WHOLE lot of $$$ for me to switch vehicles!!