BBK shorty headers

Discussion in 'SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech' started by fast97gt, Feb 19, 2010.


  1. Rickyll7

    Rickyll7 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2005
    Messages:
    709
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    19
  2. 007

    007 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2002
    Messages:
    3,291
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    59
    Location:
    Broke
    Guys, I think you pretty much all agree but are failing to get it out in a way you all agree on. I'll have one attempt in laymans terms. Then I'll butt out:

    We all know power is a simple function of torque and rpm. Increase either the torque or use-able rev range of an engine and you increase the power output. That makes your car faster. Its that simple.:shrug:

    A nice easy example, is a formula one engine. My lowly NA mustang has more torque than the F1 car!! :nice:The formula one motor, however, revs to 18000 rpm and generates crazy power!:D
     
    #82
  3. fast97gt

    fast97gt Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Messages:
    1,082
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    49
    Location:
    north carolina
    Well all I know is that my car made 195hp and 245ft/lbs of torque with the npi motor and would trap the same as my 89lx with 215hp and 245ft/lbs of torque and it with 373s and my 97 with 410s
     
    #83
  4. Rickyll7

    Rickyll7 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2005
    Messages:
    709
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    19
    Basically yes. Increasing tq will make you faster. The difference is that knowing the tq of an engine tells you only half the story. You need to also know the rpm that the tq is made at to understand the engines ability to accelerate a vehicle. Most will agree with that. What they don't realize is that knowing rpm and tq IS hp.

    hp = tq*rpm
     
    #84
  5. Winters98GT

    Winters98GT Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!! Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 1999
    Messages:
    7,848
    Likes Received:
    565
    Trophy Points:
    154
    Location:
    H Town
    You're comparing apples to oranges.
     
    #85
  6. ChillPhatCat

    ChillPhatCat New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    279
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY
    Well... more like he's comparing 4.10's vs 3.73's well below both car's top speed.
     
    #86
  7. Rickyll7

    Rickyll7 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2005
    Messages:
    709
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    19
    Not to mention the weight difference between the two cars.
     
    #87

Share This Page