C&L or PRO-M????? and why

[big o car 4.6]

I have a Pro-m because of a nitrous back fire the distroyed my stock maf. But I see a great deal of people post about the C&L MAF. Is the C&L better than the Pro-m or is there not really a differenc? Thanks

-Ashton

 

[big o car 4.6]

any thoughts?

 

[KJ Hoppus]

i know the c&n uses stock electronics while the prom uses there own.

 

[Sleepy1]

Pro-M bench flows all their own MAF and send you the flow sheet. And you can get it in chrome too.

 

[big o car 4.6]

so what one is better?

 

[Sleepy1]

Pro-M for sure

 

[Bone Racing]

most will say pro m
i have a c-l on my 4.6 and not 1 complaint

 

[mhanna77]

It make sense that Pro-M would be the better choice because they actually calibrate their meter while the C&L just re-uses the stock unit. But Pro-M needs to make a kit that will acomplish what the C&L does; one that attaches to the car and has a heat sheild (aluminum not plastic) to keep the filter under the hood.
I like the C&L "kit" but re-using the OEM meter is stupid.

 

[Avenger]

Most shops prefer tuning the Pro-M