Chassis Detailing a '66 GT350

Discussion in 'Classic Talk' started by gtmegrad, May 5, 2007.

  1. gtmegrad New Member

    Member Since:
    May 5, 2007
    Message Count:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Georgia
    I am restoring a '66 GT350. I have the car disassembled to the point where the front sheetmetal, front suspension, and the drivetrain have been removed from the car. I plan to detail the undercarriage.

    Should I remove all of the old seam sealer and undercoating and reapply? I can't just paint over old undercoating, can I?

    As it stands I plan to take digital pictures before stripping so I can reapply the new undercoating in a similar pattern. Strip it down. Apply a heavy duty primer similar to Eastwood's Rust Encapsulator. Apply undercoating and seam sealer. Finally adding a coat or two of Eastwood Chassis black over the entire surface.

    Thanks in advance!
  2. chepsk8 Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 15, 2001
    Message Count:
    2,204
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Easton, PA
    Basically, a 66 GT-350 is still a Mustang built in San Jose, California, so follow the correct practices for that production. No Undercoating from the factory. Then, Shelby American Added thier modifications, so you need to be aware of those special things.
  3. 65mistress New Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 17, 2004
    Message Count:
    408
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Generica USA
    I have a mustang from Milpitas/San Jose plant, it has a reddish undercoating applied. I thought that was specific to San Jose, am I more confused than normal?
  4. BB1966 New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 1, 2004
    Message Count:
    297
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Beaufort , NC USA!!!!
    That "reddish" stuff is primer,most of these cars had very little undercoating but lots of seam sealer.
  5. '66 coupe Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 7, 2000
    Message Count:
    1,677
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Lakeland, Fl.
    Yea, no undercoating on my '66. It was also DSO'd for San Jose on top of being built there.
  6. chromedog New Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    555
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    worlds center for speed
    my 65, dearborn car/ atlanta dso had very little undercoating, mostly in the rear wheelwells. correct me if im wrong, (im SURE someone will!) but i thought shelbys were void of factory undercoating
  7. chepsk8 Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 15, 2001
    Message Count:
    2,204
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Easton, PA
    The Early cars (65-67) indeed had none.
  8. 88gt Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 2, 1999
    Message Count:
    806
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drillers cabin
    My early '65 has enough undercoating for 3 cars..DSO St. Louis...could be dealer/other applied:shrug:

    Jim

Share This Page