COUPLE OF PICTURES OF MY STANG

Should a sn95 be this low.

  • Yes

    Votes: 12 63.2%
  • No

    Votes: 3 15.8%
  • Don't give a ****

    Votes: 4 21.1%

  • Total voters
    19
  • Poll closed .

vernell69

New Member
Nov 10, 2003
20
0
1
GLENDALE,AZ
I just dropped my 1995 v6 soon to be 347 with lowering springs from a friend.
Tell me what u think.




Keith
 

Attachments

  • KEITH'S CAR 5.JPG
    KEITH'S CAR 5.JPG
    42.7 KB · Views: 222
  • Sponsors (?)


347

347 : Comp cams 555 int 565 ext 274 int dur 282 exh dur112 degree lobe center, 4340 steel crank srp frg 10.5:1 compr pistons, 7 qt canton pan, edelbrock perform rpm heads with 2.02 int 1.60 ext,edelbrock perf 5.0 intake,mac equal lghth headers, 75mm pro-m mass air, 24lb injectors, 70mm tb, and flowmaster 2 1/2 catt-back.

Soon Nos 150 shot and 8.8 with 3:73's.


Hope to run low 12's to high 11's.


Keith
 
vernell69 said:
347 : Comp cams 555 int 565 ext 274 int dur 282 exh dur112 degree lobe center, 4340 steel crank srp frg 10.5:1 compr pistons, 7 qt canton pan, edelbrock perform rpm heads with 2.02 int 1.60 ext,edelbrock perf 5.0 intake,mac equal lghth headers, 75mm pro-m mass air, 24lb injectors, 70mm tb, and flowmaster 2 1/2 catt-back.

Soon Nos 150 shot and 8.8 with 3:73's.


Hope to run low 12's to high 11's.


Keith

definently high 11s with some driving. I didnt know using edel heads made the compression that high. i know 10.5 isnt high, but that just seems higher than what i was expecting. why is this?