Mustang vs. Camaro/Challenger

Discussion in '2005 - 2012 (S-197) Mustang' started by 226embarcadero, Feb 14, 2008.

  1. 226embarcadero New Member

    Member Since:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Message Count:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    Speaking of interiors...

    I thought the exact same thing with the actual PRODUCTION model of the Challenger. Dodge totally jacked up the interior and made it look like garbage.

    The CONCEPT version of the Challenger looked GREAT!!! But then Dodge turned it around and essentially made it look like a tweaked Charger.

    I was disappointed.
  2. 226embarcadero New Member

    Member Since:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Message Count:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    WOW... the exterior of the Challenger looks great. There's no denying that.
  3. ufnavy06 New Member

    Member Since:
    May 23, 2006
    Message Count:
    300
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Jacksonville, Florida
    First off, I am a through and through Mopar kinda guy. I would give some of my manliness for a Hemi 'Cuda. However, as I say that, I have been extremely delighted by my Mustang (I've always liked Mustang as a model, where as the Mopar stuff I liked the Hemi... so gimme a Hemi 'Stang and I'll be good to go! :D ). But if I had unlimited funds, it'd be the Mustang. No doubt. As much as I love that Challenger, the weight and such puts such a burden on the car so the upgrades won't do as much etc, plus there is sooo much more for the Mustang and that will continue even if the Challenger is around for a few years. Dodge just won't sell enough of them to make a huge aftermarket following for them like there is for the Mustang.


    But you know this will happen, imagine the Hennessy Challenger SRT10 as I'm sure he's already put the Viper engine in the car.
  4. kooldawg6 mine works really well and can take a fair amount

    Member Since:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Central VA
    +1 on the exterior look of the Chalenger!
    I wish Ford would have stuck with the concept's design of the trunk to give us the same tail light treatment!
    [IMG]
  5. LV51FER New Member

    Member Since:
    Oct 25, 2005
    Message Count:
    319
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Caerphilly, Wales, UK
    Silver Horse Racing do the fuel doors and the rear faux gas caps
  6. kenaimone New Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Message Count:
    82
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    only time will tell, but will say that a good set of headers for that car wont cost $1200.00. i have owned a ton of mustangs and i still love my car, but i wont turn a blind eye to a car that i will have to get use to seeing the taillights of. sorry but it will take the work of shelby to get us up to the level the the camaro will be from the jump. ford give us push rod power.
  7. ranger04 New Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Message Count:
    246
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If you just want to match the mopar in hp, just buy a 2010 GT as it will have an all aluminum 4 valve per cylinder 425 hp 302 and gets 30 mpg. You will save some money to boot as the new blowpar will be 37 grand before dealer markup. Also the car weighs a round 4100 pounds, so you'll save some weight as well. The new dodge looks really good but it has nothing on the mustang. At 4100 pounds and an automatic, I won't hide to hard from one with my 281. Lets face it, a lot of us are ford guy's and aren't going to change if the others came bathed in gold. For some, the mustang is the flavor of the month and will buy a challenger or camero. Some folks are more than likely chevy or dodge fans and only have a stang because the others have nothing to offer. For them I'm glad that they will be able to get a chevy or dodge pony car. For us diehards, it's ford no matter what. As for ford, if we can get 425 hp and 30 mpg out of a 302, I'm satisfired.
  8. Okiewan New Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 16, 2007
    Message Count:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Dallas
    Mind pointing me to the source for that statement? If it's correct, I won't be putting another dime in my '08.
  9. Dreadnaught New Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 5, 2006
    Message Count:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    "The short run of 2008 Challenger SRT8s will be followed by a tamer 2009 lineup to include a six-cylinder base model and a 5.7-liter Hemi V8 R/T model. Though its interior is different, the production Challenger looks nearly identical to the concept car on the outside. The concept car was directly inspired by the 1970 Dodge Challenger." - Forbes Auto.

    If this is true...I may convert hah.
  10. ranger04 New Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Message Count:
    246
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Okiewan, I'm the source for that statement, don't you trust me? Actually it's from an article in this forum, it's under the post, "ford to drop the V-8 from the mustang?" One of the posters has a link posted to the article.
  11. Okiewan New Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 16, 2007
    Message Count:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Dallas
    Ahh.. this one: http://www.autosavant.net/2008/02/details-emerge-on-new-mustang-gt-engine.html

    Let's hope the gossip is correct. If the 2010 GT has that motor and they don't hose-up the look of the car, I'll be a the dealer the day it releases.
  12. ranger04 New Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Message Count:
    246
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The link to the article is on post #17. It's probobly just a tamer version of the 5.0 dohc craete motor allthough the article says it's very high tech. By then we should be able to stroke our 3 valves up to a 302 and with a head, cam and intake manifild package should get us close to 450 hp. Sutton and a lot of the aftermarket is really going after the 3 valve, I have no dout in the real near future 400 hp will be common on these motors. FRPP is supost to be developing a set of cams good for 27 hp on unported heads and lets us keep our mid range, more hp on ported heads. Add a 302 stroker with other bolt ons and someone builds us an intake mannie I could see us in the 400 + range all motor. Sutton says he's close to 400 hp with just cams and heads and is shooting for 400 hp at the wheels. At 4100 pounds and no manual tranny we should be knocking on the challengers door with some gears, slicks and our 281. It's reported the challenger is in the 12's, were close to that stock. The challenger isn't as scarey as it once was now that nmore details are surfacing.

Share This Page