2000R's are bad@$$ cars, but I never cared for the looks of em personally... I would rather hav a 95 Cobra R, or even a 93..... Google Image Result for http://www.performanceautosport.com/images/cars/95R%2086%201%20500.jpg
there is a guy local that has a 93 R, 95 R and not one but two 2000 R's all with less than 1K on them. it's one hell of a collection. theres also a pair of Saleen Cobras
Say wah?! If I ever found out where someone with a REAL '95 R lived, they better put that **** under lock and chain...
not a performance bargain. No A/C, Radio and it's not that fast. Complete waste, unless you want a collector car. the front bumper and wing are retarded looking. And it's a pig at 3500 pounds even if it does break 1g. A complete flop for those that paid the "dealer markup" at the time on a so called "street legal racecar" The 1995 cobra looks much better IMO.
With all due respect, I disagree except in the looks department, but I think both cars are sick in their own way. A/C, radio, and other creature comforts are dead weight and useless on the track. Not that fast in the 1/4 mile maybe, but it has clicked off a 12.9 with a road race suspension in a non-Mustang specific magazine, which means there are probably a few 1/10ths still in it under a better driver. I consider over 170mph out of a bone stock car fast as hell though. Body parts may look a little out of place, but they are functional. I'd be pissed if they were just for looks, but Ford did the homework on this one. Front lower lip is removable too. I agree the markups suck, but thats greed for ya...