trans am or mustang

Hey guys, I'm new here, so hi.

But what do you guys think I can get a 95 thrans am for a little over 3 grand or I can get a 94-95 for like almost 5 grand and it really aggravates me because I love mustangs since I've had my first one, but the prices people want for some of these stock mustangs are ridiculous what do you guys think.

if a 95 trans am cost 3k, then its most likely beat to shtt and/or in terrible condition

you can definately find mustangs for cheaper than you can find trans ams. just how it is. more mustangs produced. like mentioned above the trans am is probably a piece of crap.

I think I saw the opposite of the prices you mentioned. T/As and Cameros are overpriced because there are so few of them. So every owner thinks he has a collector's item.

In fact, I got a little curious and ran an AutoTrader.com search. I found one (that's 1) Trans Am within 300 miles of me. And I found 70 Mustangs (limited to V8's in both cases, of course). The T/A was listed at $10,500, and there were a bunch of Mustangs under $6,500

But if you really found one that cheap, give it a real close look because it sounds too good to be true.

Sounds way to cheap to be a good car imo move along.

The 93-97 ta's are'int that reliable from what ive heard, the water pump suck go out quick. my mustang has the suck pump work's great 10 year's old, so for 3k iam sure somthing happend.

This is STANG net.

Heh, we're kind of biased.

This is just me, after the mustang comes a trans am ram air. But that's AFTER the mustang.

lol, if the trans am is only costing 3k.. then it isn't in great shape.. trust me. all T/A's and Z28's cost more than 94-95 stangs with equal miles.

i'd rather work on my mustang than any LT1 anyday. Just pop the hoods on both and you'll see what i'm talking about, lol. And i've owned both too. It's just the little things that ford does to make the job a little bit easier.

:werd: same here