what year does everyone have here? poll...
- Thread starter 12sec67
- Start date
-
Sponsors (?)
Shamrock
Founding Member
Edbert said:111 views and 49 votes? Must be all of those LS1 folks over here
I'm an LS1 folk, but was a stangnet folk before that, just haven't been here in a while.
And 66 takes the victory because we all know it's the best year ever (I'm not biased at all even after owning a 66 coupe and now a 66 fastback)
Talk to blake about getting into the early&late model owners club. He's got a 66/96 thing and I've got a 67/97 in my driveway/garage, then there's 68&00GT, plus a few others. Of course the 71 is still considered a 1st gen, so maybe (even though it is a different decade) doesn't qualifymtpony said:
bud4660
Founding Member
dolfan87
Founding Member
66's are kickin' butt!
LOL, I don't think a 71 is going to qualify as a late model.
Edbert said:
LOL, I don't think a 71 is going to qualify as a late model.
electricgreen said:
Too new for what? A 73 is 30+ years old now, I don't think anyone is going to realistically try to claim a 71-73 is a latemodel.
Håkan
Founding Member
Edbert said:Talk to blake about getting into the early&late model owners club. He's got a 66/96 thing and I've got a 67/97 in my driveway/garage, then there's 68&00GT, plus a few others. Of course the 71 is still considered a 1st gen, so maybe (even though it is a different decade) doesn't qualify
In Sweden too...
Hey Blake, what do I have to do to join the club?
Håkan said:
There are only two prerequisites:
1) own both a classic and a latemodel Mustang
2) just be cool, and you my friend, have cool to spare.
There's really nothing official about it, I just noticed a while ago that there are a select few of us that are so lucky (or obsessed) as to have one of each. It came up conversationally enough times, that I just started calling it the StangNet Classic and Late Model Owners Association, and it stuck.
electricgreen said:
Well, I think its safe to say that those few early model guys that expressed that opinion are just plain wrong. 65-to-73 = classic. Thats all there is to it.
Heck, we are discussing this in the classic forum, aren't we?
66 BLAKE 96 said:Well, I think its safe to say that those few early model guys that expressed that opinion are just plain wrong. 65-to-73 = classic. Thats all there is to it.
Heck, we are discussing this in the classic forum, aren't we?
It wasn't anyone here, that's for sure. It was at a show, and a friend of ours with a 65...
Håkan
Founding Member
66 BLAKE 96 said:There are only two prerequisites:
1) own both a classic and a latemodel Mustang
2) just be cool, and you my friend, have cool to spare.
There's really nothing official about it, I just noticed a while ago that there are a select few of us that are so lucky (or obsessed) as to have one of each. It came up conversationally enough times, that I just started calling it the StangNet Classic and Late Model Owners Association, and it stuck.
Thanks, sounds great Blake! I consider myself a member then...In my case it´s both luck and obsession, luck because I married the right woman that talked me in to buying the ´94 GT convertible and she also let me spend all the time it takes to work with the obsession I have in restoring/modifying the ´67.
steelhorse
Member
Håkan said:
In my case it´s both luck and obsession, luck because I married the right woman that talked me in to buying the ´94 GT convertible and she also let me spend all the time it takes to work with the obsession I have in restoring/modifying the ´67.
Excellent!
Now there is the small matter of the membership fees...
Just kidding of course.
It sounds like we are both quite lucky indeed my friend.
