How much power can I expect from a 331 with everything thats listed in my sig? What kind of times in the 1/4 would I run on DR?
grn92lx - He is talking about the steeper rod ratio...it does put a slight amount more on the sidewalls of the cylinders.
How much power can I expect from a 331 with everything thats listed in my sig?
What kind of times in the 1/4 would I run on DR?
zZsKyZz said:I heard that 347's are more likely to break due to the angle of the rods? :shrugs:
Note: I'm not speaking from experience, just regurgitating info I've heard from others, so take this with a grain of salt.
yobi1kanobi said:You see where I stand
Black95GTS said:If you are staying NA, then there is really no reason to go 331 over a 347, unless you are racing in some kind of class that prohibits engines of that size.
Black95GTS said:It will be very difficult to make enough power / RPM to break a stock block staying naturally aspirated. Are you telling me that you're gonna make 500 RWHP or spin the motor to 8K all the time? With an E cam, AFR 165s, and a track heat? No way.
final5-0 said:Funny thing about a lot of the info that is heard and passed on is
in many instances, the source is not known to be from one who has experience from doing it.
final5-0 said:The 347 rod ratio is not as bad as some OEM Production motors.
SeventyMach1 said:Grady, I'd like to help in your efforts to debunk internet myths. That's something that I can't stand. But this is one of those things that I do not consider myth (BTW, yes, I realize the quote above isn't necessarily in reference to the 347 vs. 331 debate). I have talked to 5 different [thouroughly experienced] engine builders. They all agree that the 347 stroker has more stress on the rings and creates more side load. This, being from experienced builders, rules it out as "myth" in my book.
This is where the consumer steps in. Is 16 c.i. (which will equate to ~20 hp, depending on combo) worth a "possibly" shorter engine life? There are 347's that last longer than 331's with roughly the same combo. So it is a decision to make. But I don't think it is exactly a critical decision. You just have to weigh the facts (after you find them, lol) and go from there.
This is definitely true.
Now, personally, my new combo will be a 347. I've done a few years worth of research on this. My decision was to take the 16 c.i. & run. If my engine ends up lasting a few thousand miles less than the typical 331, it's still worth it to me.