Thought you guys might like this article...
Engineer Gets 110 MPG Out Of '87 Mustang - Automotive News Story - KMBC Kansas City
Engineer Gets 110 MPG Out Of '87 Mustang - Automotive News Story - KMBC Kansas City
Engineer Gets 110 MPG Out Of '87 Mustang
- Thread starter impulse001
- Start date
-
Sponsors (?)
7upstang91
10 Year Member
This guy won't give away his secret though. He has several mustangs like this.
Impluse101 you are only what...roughly 100mpg off? you will get there one day. Sorry I'm having bad mpg issues as well. Hope you get yours taken care of.
Impluse101 you are only what...roughly 100mpg off? you will get there one day. Sorry I'm having bad mpg issues as well. Hope you get yours taken care of.
Chrome_Rust
Member
Guy that built this is a friend of mine.... here is a link to the technology.
I have seen and had a ride in the car. I have bought numerous mustang parts from him. It isn't a hoax. It is real.
YouTube - HP2g 110MPG V8 Engine Technology for Revenge Verde Super Car Shown at NAIAS 2010
YouTube - extremearts1's Channel
I have seen and had a ride in the car. I have bought numerous mustang parts from him. It isn't a hoax. It is real.
YouTube - HP2g 110MPG V8 Engine Technology for Revenge Verde Super Car Shown at NAIAS 2010
YouTube - extremearts1's Channel
foxmustangman
Member
giddyup306
Founding Member
- Oct 22, 2002
- 3,041
- 2
- 59
Sorry guys but I'm going to have to remain a skeptic. His claims are just too incredible for me to believe. Keep in mind that there are patents for 100 MPG carbs and the Loch Ness Monster photo was published in news papers and cited as authentic.
I realize that he is running e85 (which really he'll end up burning more fuel), has an electric motor, and has MDS, but look at single cylinder bikes like the Buell Blast. They have an electronic feedback carb and only make around 70 MPG. That's on a bike that weighs less than 400 lbs not a mustang that weighs over 3000, and he's claiming to make almost twice that.
Without me actually physically seeing this thing in action I will remain a skeptic.
I realize that he is running e85 (which really he'll end up burning more fuel), has an electric motor, and has MDS, but look at single cylinder bikes like the Buell Blast. They have an electronic feedback carb and only make around 70 MPG. That's on a bike that weighs less than 400 lbs not a mustang that weighs over 3000, and he's claiming to make almost twice that.
Without me actually physically seeing this thing in action I will remain a skeptic.
why, we put a man on the moon in the 60's you really think that there is not a simple way to make us go places at more than 15mpg
esp considering the state he lives in... 
1990Coupe
Founding Member
Interesting, this isn't the same guy from a few years back who claimed to get this kind of mileage from his 87 lx mustang to win some 1million dollar challenge is it?
EDIT: it is, and its 10million.. my bad
EDIT: it is, and its 10million.. my bad
Interesting, this isn't the same guy from a few years back who claimed to get this kind of mileage from his 87 lx mustang to win some 1million dollar challenge is it?
EDIT: it is, and its 10million.. my bad
wasnt he proven to be a fraud?? I remember reading up on him a lot and he wouldnt back any of his claims. He also caught some heat over on corral for some other dealings he had going on.
When they hyper-miled the new Fusion hybrid, didn't it get more than 80mpg? I don't think its necessarily impossible, just very unlikely.
I notice the news article claims that typical efficiencies of gasoline engines are about 8-10%. If they are talking thermal efficiency, they are way off. IIRC, typical gasoline engine thermal efficiency is roughly 25-30% (though its been a while since I took thermodynamics class). They do say that his is 38%.
I notice the news article claims that typical efficiencies of gasoline engines are about 8-10%. If they are talking thermal efficiency, they are way off. IIRC, typical gasoline engine thermal efficiency is roughly 25-30% (though its been a while since I took thermodynamics class). They do say that his is 38%.
Thermal efficiency of an internal combustion gasoline motor is roughly 25-30% as stated, diesel about 40-45% and those are the best out there. This car at roughly 55mph on a flat surface with no wind resistance would have to boast at least 68-70% efficiency to achieve the results he claims. So unless the laws of physics cease to apply under the hood of his car its just not possible.
