Anyone heard of, thought about, or used hollow-stemmed or hollow-stemmed, Sodium-filled valves?
I think if you combine them with beehive springs, and the smaller retainer that comes along with them, even in moly, not Titanium, you'll have less valvetrain mass than by using conventional double or triple springs, and Ti retainers AND valves.
Plus you'll have the longer lasting stainless valves and moly retainers.
Plus you'll have less spring poundage sapping power.
And better spring resonance dampening, leading to more potential rpm.
If you use less poundage on the spring, the strength of the two-piece, hollow valve will be less of an issue. If you combine it with a cam that isn't overly agressive, I'm thinking it'd be a decent setup.
I worked out that over standard dual springs, stainless valves and moly retainers you would save, at 6500rpm, 80lb of mass from moving around in the valvetrain EVERY SECOND.
I'm wondering why, like beehives, I haven't heard much of them. Is it a strength issue?
Looking forward to your input!
I think if you combine them with beehive springs, and the smaller retainer that comes along with them, even in moly, not Titanium, you'll have less valvetrain mass than by using conventional double or triple springs, and Ti retainers AND valves.
Plus you'll have the longer lasting stainless valves and moly retainers.
Plus you'll have less spring poundage sapping power.
And better spring resonance dampening, leading to more potential rpm.
If you use less poundage on the spring, the strength of the two-piece, hollow valve will be less of an issue. If you combine it with a cam that isn't overly agressive, I'm thinking it'd be a decent setup.
I worked out that over standard dual springs, stainless valves and moly retainers you would save, at 6500rpm, 80lb of mass from moving around in the valvetrain EVERY SECOND.
I'm wondering why, like beehives, I haven't heard much of them. Is it a strength issue?
Looking forward to your input!