ok im down to these 2 shifters. can anybody who knows about these or own any of these shifters fill me in and tell me which one is better. in other words the pros and cons of each shifter. thanks.
sgarlic said:To sum up what you may find doing a search, Tri-Ax owners vs MGW owners generally comes down to 2 arguments.
1) Tri-ax is supposedly louder than the MGW. I've only run the MGW, so I don't personally know what a tri-ax sounds like, but my MGW is just as quiet as the stock was (without using any extra gaskets, etc.)
2) Shifter strength. The guy at MGW claims the handle is all but unbreakable. I've never heard of one breaking, but I have read at least one thread of a tri-ax owner who broke theirs.
I believe you will be much happier regardless of what decision you make, but as an MGW owner, I highly recommend it.
Good luck with whatever choice you make.
jposthauer said:Give me a break, so what if one fat tard broke his shifter. That is a rare thing and could probably happen to any in some rare circumstance. The triax shouldn't break, it's made just as good if not better than MGW.
sgarlic said:Ok, show me an instance where somebody has broken an MGW handle then. I bet all the searching in the world won't lead you to a post like that.
And whether the guy who broke the tri-ax was a fat tard or not, it still broke, and one shouldn't have that in the back of their mind while in the middle of a race.
Roger_4.6_96 said:Everyone here likes tri ax. I would just run a search and private message people who actually have MGW shifter.