SamMan said:Right and this is the exact same mold only made from aluminum. With any exposive the more force you have holding it together the more force the explosion will release when w/e gives finally gives.
So where is the energy from the backfire going to go?
Plus the surface of the inside of this thing is going to be more rough than the plastic one right?
Wouldnt that be more prone to fuel puddling? Or less?
nic01scgt said:So this means us who get free intake manifold replacement from Ford will get this intake paid for in full by Ford right? Don't the reumburse up to 750$?
Gearbanger 101 said:What facts would you like? How about thermodynamics? It's a well known fact that aluminum transfers heat much faster than composite plastic. Why do you think most carb and intake spacers are made of composite instead of aluminum? Do I really have to rip through my old college text books and write the formulas and transfer rates down for you to grasp this?
The SVO and Bullitt intakes are also of a much higher flowing design than the stock PI unit. People running these intakes are also not putting them on bone stock cars!!! Not to mention that for nitrous or forced induction purposes (where these intakes thrive) the sturdier all aluminum piece is better from just a longevity perspective alone. Besides, we're not comparing that...we're comparing two nearly identical intakes made of different materials. One that conducts and transfers heat and another that does it to a much smaller degree. Common sense will tell you which one will keep the air charge cooler.
Like I stated earlier, only time will tell. But considering how long this company has been trying to put this intake out, without any major success and what little changes they’ve made to it, I don’t see this intake revolutionizing the industry any time soon!
droptopponynj said:I like this guys attempt at a lower intake better, not just a copy but attempt at improveing on the PI lower. This guys been posting on corral for years and has a 96gt..
www.purpleracing.com
View attachment 502533 View attachment 502535 View attachment 502537
Dark Knight GT said:Dude, the color of that thing makes me wonder if you're going to put it in a Mustang, or the Joker mobile.
Seriously, I do respect the fact that the guy had made a aluminum lower intake design with larger runners, but he's asking 900 dollars for the piece, and no dyno results as of yet to make anyone feel its worth it to purchase one.
mogs01gt said:the main problem with out 2v intakes is the runners. Nitrous puddles in the runners when/if a nitrous backfire happens, it blows apart the intake. Most other intakes to not have the runner design we have and the puddling problem.
nitrous backfires can be caused anywhere in the intake track, not just our lower runners and/or runners on other engines.Joel's98GT said:nitrous backfires are caused my puddling, not the other way around.
and a big enough backfire will sen any intake through a hood, an al. one is only insurance for small ones.
SamMan said:So what happens with a nitrous backfire with regards to this intake?
They claim the intake will NEVER crack but Ive seen a vid of an aluminum cobra intake blown into little peices due to a 150 shot backfire. So what you get little aluminum pieces in your valves versus little plastic ones?
Those manifolds are cast aluminum. O wait so is this one lol