Ford to reveal 2011 Mustang powertrain updates at L.A. Auto Show

Discussion in '2010 - 2012 Specific Tech' started by rk2112, Oct 26, 2009.

  1. rk2112 New Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 12, 2009
    Message Count:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
  2. YSUsteven New Member

    Member Since:
    May 19, 2009
    Message Count:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Most of us already knew, but thanks for posting.
  3. rk2112 New Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 12, 2009
    Message Count:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
    I Wasn't sure if everyone knew the new motors would be unveiled at the LA Auto show. You can sign up for updates on the LA Auto website.
  4. YSUsteven New Member

    Member Since:
    May 19, 2009
    Message Count:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Now, that I din't know. Thanks :nice:
  5. Fast05 New Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 17, 2005
    Message Count:
    409
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Corpus Christi, TX
    I don't think any of us will be surprised...this is what I expect:

    GT - 5.0L 400HP with a 6spd manual finally offered. Probably will pick up some weight but still won't be a cow like the Camaro.

    V6 - 3.7L 280HP....not sure what transmissions will be offered.

    GT500 - 5.0 Supercharged, better tires and suspension for improved launching.

    I'd be more surprised if they didn't have these offerings.

    The GT and V6 offerings will put the Mustang into Camaro territory for HP and being that it's a lighter vehicle with a live axle as long as the tires can hook up I'd go ahead and bet that in the next comparison of the muscle cars it won't even be a competition anymore seeing as how Mustang already won overall value this year with an engine that's about 15 years old and a log axle out back that does it's job better than the fancy IRS in the Camaro. Not to mention the interior of the Camaro....further proof why GM can't get its act together.
  6. white-04 New Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Message Count:
    150
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Owings, MD
    I don't think the GT will go straight to 400. Need something for the future and special models. I say they hold back around the 350 area, still 35 more horse than the previous.
  7. bluestang50 New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 24, 2006
    Message Count:
    77
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    lawrenceville, ga
    I pray you are right. I have been waiting about 6 years for the coyote to come out. If yall remember i believe its first code name was the "hurricane".
  8. scupking Active Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,198
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Enfield, CT
    I say this is what the line up will look like.

    Boss 302 = 5.0L 400hp and 6 speed maunal
    GT = 4.6L 350hp 6 speed manual and 6 speed auto
    V6 = 3.7L 260-280hp 6 speed manual and 6 speed auto
    GT-500= 5.4L at 600hp
  9. All-Or-Nothing New Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 13, 2009
    Message Count:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0


    I really want the 400hp/400tq but Ford is kind of slow to increase HP on Mustangs unless it's a special version. Just think a 1990 GT had 225hp/300tq and 20 years later it's only been raised 90hp. Now they are going to make a 85hp to 100hp jump in a year.


    I really want to believe but it's kind of hard. However this is a new Ford we're talking about so it does seem more likely now.
  10. bhuff30 Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Message Count:
    5,796
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    Lenexa KS
    I'm surprised no one mentioned the ecoboost 3.5l. It makes 365hp in the SHO and is easily cabable of more. Being a turbo engine, it will make more power VERY easily with aftermarket options.

    I beleive ford will offer this engine in the mustang around the same time as the new 5.0. The fuel economy ratings will be tightening up soon and this V6 makes awsome power with small v6 gas mileage. While a snarling 400hp v8 would be awsome, I would probably opt for this v6.
  11. All-Or-Nothing New Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 13, 2009
    Message Count:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    From another board but something to think about. Just a quote. I do not know if this true.




  12. scupking Active Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,198
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Enfield, CT
    I hope they don't go with IRS. The log out back right now performs better then Dodges or Chevys IRS setup.
  13. bhuff30 Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Message Count:
    5,796
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    Lenexa KS
    Take 800lbs out of the chevy and dodge muscle cars, to equal the weight of the mustang and see what happens. Those cars are way obese and of course that hurts handling. I agree that the solid axle has been refined and works well in the mustang, but it is still prone to bind and not the best option for handling.

    Sounds like the ecoboost mustang will beawsome when it comes out! I'll be done with my degree by then, so maybe I can afford one. :)

  14. Fast05 New Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 17, 2005
    Message Count:
    409
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Corpus Christi, TX
    I wouldn't mind seeing IRS as an option...but not in all of them. I honestly am quite content with my log out back.
  15. DougNuts Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 11, 2000
    Message Count:
    2,598
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Georgetown Ky
    You must have meant to say 250-400lbs.
  16. lightblade Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 8, 2004
    Message Count:
    373
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Nah, the hurricane was the code name for the 6.2L V8 non-modular that ford nixed a few years ago and may be working on again. It was being designed for heavyduty truck platforms.

    Instead they developed the 6.8L V10 which they make in 2v and 3v form. Its used in the e and f series superduty and was an option for the excursion i believe.
  17. bhuff30 Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Message Count:
    5,796
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    Lenexa KS
    Far as I know, the curb weight of the mustang is around 3400. I looked up the dodge challanger SRT-8 and it is 4140. One could round up to an 800lb difference..., but maybe the real difference is closer to 700lbs. My mistake.

  18. cougar_68 Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 6, 2001
    Message Count:
    849
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Garrett, IN
    He may have been talking about the rumor that the Mustang will be putting on a few pounds. The 5.0L engine alone is 150lbs heavier than the 4.6L.
  19. DougNuts Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 11, 2000
    Message Count:
    2,598
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Georgetown Ky
    Nah, you're right, the V6 is about that. It's pretty easy to get a GT with leather up to about 3600.

    While I don't doubt a small weight increase for the overall car, how in the world can the 4.6 gain 150lbs when going to a 5.0? Going to a 4V head and cast aluminum intake can't add that much can it? :eek:
  20. Mike97gt it doe snot

    Member Since:
    Jan 26, 1999
    Message Count:
    12,475
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    76
    Location:
    the people's republic of massachusetts
    Where did he hear the 5.0 motor is 150 pounds heavier? the 4.6 is a heavy ass motor for it's small displacement.. I have a hard time believing anything short of a diesel could be heavier than that thing


    BTW I don't think the 5.0 is a modular it's a all new design

Share This Page