rj95svt
Member
This is an interesting thread, going back to stock.
I can tell you about retarding the cam, it's a bad idea. Don't know if you were reading my threads 10 years ago in this forum but I did that with my Crower cam. I would have to rev the hell out of the car just to get it moving. The power didn't start until about 4500rpm, yes 4 degrees is that far up in the bandwith. It pulled to 7000 rpm and banged off the MSD limiter I had in it. I can tell you from experience it wasn't a fun time. I then changed it to straight up and never looked back, it ran great even with a blower. With stock parts it should be worse.
Hey guys been awhile since I posted over here. I disagree with this. It's a apples to oranges comparison. A aftermarket cam that has a longer duration than stock already moves the power band up and if the cam is not right for the combo and say a little to large for the combo retarding the cam will have the affect you mentioned. In a situation where the cam is on the small side it could help. We are talking about moving a roughly 4400 rpm peak hp to around 4800 in this case so I think it would not hurt it. That said I would be surprised if more than 5hp is gained but it's free.
On a driveability note it's hard to say what it might do as the stock computer is gonna be firing the injectors at the same time it would be for the stock cam valve events in the straight up position. However I don't think it would be much difference if any at all. Like the OP said the worse that could happen is having to take the front cover off and change it back to stock.
Porting the heads will help only if the bowl areas are worked taking the bumps out of the exhaust ports will have little to no affect on power. I must admit though it sure looks like it would help. After looking at the intake you know where the major restriction is. A GT40 intake doesn't look good but the stock GT intake looks alot worse. The end runners have some very bad bends.