misc ramblings at nmra about future powertrain...doh!!!

Discussion in 'SN95 4.6 Talk' started by billfisher, Oct 9, 2006.

  1. billfisher Active Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,293
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    huntsville, AL
    this is my first opportunity to post a discussion of 2008 or 2009 mustang gt powertrain directions...
    i was talking to Al Papito and a few of his fellow "guys that know" concerning future directions of motors for this car.

    the word is, that ford is considering using the lincoln LS 3.9l v8 as the standard GT motor. according to Al, it's a POS motor. fuel economy seems to be driving things. i wonder if the MOD motor is going the way of the dinosaur altogether? no word on that, but a small 4v v8 is not good news.


    -bill
  2. bigcat start with the upper hole, and if more traction is

    Member Since:
    May 2, 2005
    Message Count:
    4,250
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    7200 feet
    :bs: if ford goes smaller than the current 4.6 that so many already complain about, they would be shooting themselves in the foot. now if that motor was optional, and not in a GT, but something similar to an LX, then they may have something, depending on power output. i am not familiar with that motor at all. :shrug:

    all the rumors floating around out there about more displacement and added power, i cant believe they would go conservative on us. :bang:

    doesnt the LS engine require premium fuel? i thought that was one of the reasons that tylers65 sold his LS.
  3. billfisher Active Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,293
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    huntsville, AL
    you are right.

    i just wanted to throw it out. sma;; v8 for GT...
    larger for specialty stangs. i certainly hope not.
  4. Mossberg Active Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 22, 2003
    Message Count:
    1,216
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    ATL, Shawty
    That would never happen. The Lincoln motor costs more than the 3v, and it's taking a step backwards in power.
  5. stangGT97 New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,405
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Boston area, MA
    I will burn my mustang in effigy if they introduce the 2009 GT with a 3.9L under the hood. every other company is putting "muscle" back into muscle car, all ford cares about is its stupid fuel economy ratings...
  6. CobraRed_96_GT Active Member

    Member Since:
    May 20, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,644
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    UCSD/La Jolla
    but ford has few cars that are over 22mpg, and the EPA restrictions are taking their toll. It's either change the power plant in a well selling car or design a whole new car thats way effcient like 33mpg to higher their average. I can see Ford doing this....but common..even the V6 is bigger than that. I thought the 281 was small but a 3.9? Maybe the 3.9 will be standard GT then there will be many other modles to choose from like a Boss 302 and a mach 1 w/ a 3-4V 4.6 V8
  7. san~man O-G

    Member Since:
    Jun 27, 2001
    Message Count:
    8,801
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    A little grass shack on a big lava rock
    I will most certainly be buying a Dodge in the future if Ford does that.

    5.7/6.1>>>>3.9 blah!
  8. billfisher Active Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,293
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    huntsville, AL
    i guess nobody really knows, but ford has never been above killing a powertrain if they feel it is obsolete. i have a love/hate relationship with 3v and i hope it continues. at some point they need a small V8 for mileage. maybe a tweaked 3.9l but a small one never the less. remember the 4.2l from 1980.

    mismatched ports 115hp/245 lb-ft. 255 cu.in. of badd-ass power. they have done it before. it's about sales to 295 million not the few performance enthusiasts.

    however... the camaro and challenger will kill them. personally, i wouldn't mind a 280ish hp v8 stang with 30mpg highway for a commuter. i drive 75 miles one way to work. with 20mpg i get now that's a good alternative. no need to mod it because a 3.9l is worthless.

    it was the only place i have heard that said. everything else on the net points toward something to compete with 425hp 6.1l hemi and 425hp 6.0l LS-X.


    ford is not above imploding.
  9. billfisher Active Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,293
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    huntsville, AL
  10. stangGT97 New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,405
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Boston area, MA
  11. DocG2828 5th graders > me

    Member Since:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Message Count:
    8,439
    Likes Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Cincinnati area
    Hmmm....scary thought. Maybe we will see the return of the 4-banger in a mustang! I can't imagine they would really go with that small 8. I'm sure Ford isn't as concerned about their mustangs as we are, but surely they see how valuable this car is to their line-up.
  12. BooWFO New Member

    Member Since:
    May 11, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Louisville, KY
    And yet they are bringing the f450 to the average consumer buyer. Ughh...
  13. CatmanJJ Captain Tangnet

    Member Since:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Message Count:
    4,579
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    Maryland
    +1

    But what about this? Says 350-400 hp 4.6 V8 and a 3.5 260-280 hp V6.

    [IMG]

    [IMG]
  14. billfisher Active Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,293
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    huntsville, AL
    all ford has to do is the aussie thing. a boss 290 federalized. same as GTO.
  15. bigcat start with the upper hole, and if more traction is

    Member Since:
    May 2, 2005
    Message Count:
    4,250
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    7200 feet
    i would :drool: all over most of the aussie FPV engines.
  16. helty some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit

    Member Since:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,732
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Baltimore, MD
    i swear i heard the same rumors about 3-4 years ago about the 05+ mustang. Hope its not true but knowing ford lately, it probably is.
  17. san~man O-G

    Member Since:
    Jun 27, 2001
    Message Count:
    8,801
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    A little grass shack on a big lava rock
    The FPV = SEX :nice:
  18. fiveofanatic How to fuel a Mustang:

    Member Since:
    Aug 12, 1998
    Message Count:
    8,684
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ suburbs
    Been there, done that. :banana:

    I have no urge to buy a current Mustang, not even the Shelby. But if the Challenger look as good as the concept, I'll be in line. :drool:
  19. streetstang03 unModerator

    Member Since:
    Dec 27, 2003
    Message Count:
    2,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    the dark side of the moon/home of the 1999, 2003,
    thats if Ford lasts until 2009 :rlaugh:
  20. san~man O-G

    Member Since:
    Jun 27, 2001
    Message Count:
    8,801
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    A little grass shack on a big lava rock
    Just as surely as the government didn't let the major airline carriers go defunct, neither will they let one of the big 3 either.

Share This Page