Realistic Hp/tq Expectations...

Discussion in '1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-' started by CT Grim, Sep 18, 2013.

  1. revhead347

    revhead347
    Expand Collapse
    I have face herpes.

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2004
    Messages:
    6,659
    Likes Received:
    303
    Trophy Points:
    124
    Location:
    Acworth, GA
    Ok. Gotcha. Yeah, commented prior to the edits.

    Kurt
     
  2. FastDriver

    FastDriver
    Expand Collapse
    Mustang Master

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2001
    Messages:
    3,059
    Likes Received:
    217
    Trophy Points:
    84
    Location:
    Xenia, OH
    Here's what Pro-M's website has to say about the 75mm bullet:
    A general search indicates that a Lightning MAF quits somewhere around 450-500rwhp. Pretty close. I learned something here, but the point in the upgrade would be to reduce the restriction in flow. I agree with your assertion that it's not going to be worth the cost or effort, but I think it would definitely pick up something.
     
  3. revhead347

    revhead347
    Expand Collapse
    I have face herpes.

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2004
    Messages:
    6,659
    Likes Received:
    303
    Trophy Points:
    124
    Location:
    Acworth, GA
    A 75mm is no restriction to flow whatsoever. I'm still running the 75mm Pro-M I bought 14 years ago.

    Kurt
     
  4. Grabbin' Asphalt

    Grabbin' Asphalt
    Expand Collapse
    Mustang Master

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Messages:
    2,027
    Likes Received:
    296
    Trophy Points:
    104
    Location:
    Atlanta, Ga
    Curious, anyone know whats the volume of air in a N/A 302, 331, 347 can bring in at one time. I think then when that's found, one could really taylor the incoming air velocity :shrug:
     
  5. FastDriver

    FastDriver
    Expand Collapse
    Mustang Master

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2001
    Messages:
    3,059
    Likes Received:
    217
    Trophy Points:
    84
    Location:
    Xenia, OH
    calculation is VE*RPM/2*cubic inch displacement/1728 = volume in CFM (cubic feet per minute)

    Why do you believe that? When will it become a restriction to flow? Do you have any evidence that indicates that increasing the MAF size on an H/C/I 302 results in no power gain?

    Hell, what do I know. Maybe you're right. I don't bother with MAFs these days, anyway.
     
    #25 FastDriver, Sep 19, 2013
    Last edited: Sep 19, 2013
  6. Grabbin' Asphalt

    Grabbin' Asphalt
    Expand Collapse
    Mustang Master

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Messages:
    2,027
    Likes Received:
    296
    Trophy Points:
    104
    Location:
    Atlanta, Ga
    would anyone care to plug number in that equation, im at work :flag:
     
  7. FastDriver

    FastDriver
    Expand Collapse
    Mustang Master

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2001
    Messages:
    3,059
    Likes Received:
    217
    Trophy Points:
    84
    Location:
    Xenia, OH
    I'm not sure what you're trying to do.

    Ok, for ****s and giggles a 347 turning 6500 rpm at 95% volumetric efficiency, which is pretty good at that RPM, would be moving 620 CFM. This motor is going to make over 400rwhp at sea level under standard conditions.
     
    #27 FastDriver, Sep 19, 2013
    Last edited: Sep 19, 2013
  8. revhead347

    revhead347
    Expand Collapse
    I have face herpes.

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2004
    Messages:
    6,659
    Likes Received:
    303
    Trophy Points:
    124
    Location:
    Acworth, GA
    20 years of experience. A 75mm is huge for a basic HCI engine. Have you seen one? You can fist the damn thing.

    Kurt
     
  9. FastDriver

    FastDriver
    Expand Collapse
    Mustang Master

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2001
    Messages:
    3,059
    Likes Received:
    217
    Trophy Points:
    84
    Location:
    Xenia, OH
    I owned a 75mm MAF, as mentioned. FYI, 75mm is just under 3" in diameter. You have very small fists.
     
    Rick 91GT likes this.
  10. Grabbin' Asphalt

    Grabbin' Asphalt
    Expand Collapse
    Mustang Master

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Messages:
    2,027
    Likes Received:
    296
    Trophy Points:
    104
    Location:
    Atlanta, Ga
    Found this on a forum is it right??

    73 mass air = 1171 cfm
    80 mass air = 1415 cfm
    83 mass air = 1598 cfm

    70mm throttle body = 726 cfm
    75mm throttle body = 845 cfm
    90mm throttle body = 1190 cfm
     
  11. FastDriver

    FastDriver
    Expand Collapse
    Mustang Master

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2001
    Messages:
    3,059
    Likes Received:
    217
    Trophy Points:
    84
    Location:
    Xenia, OH
    If 5spdGT posted it, it probably was well researched.... sounds like something he's done here. Consider the fact that's airflow at a given pressure differential on a flow bench. Likely, it's at 26-28" vacuum. Just because they will flow that at around a 1 bar pressure differential doesn't mean they won't still cost power. Ultimately, what you're shooting for is minimal vacuum in the intake at WOT. If you have a way to read the factory MAP sensor or if you have a boost gauge, it's a pretty easy measurement.

    In one test I saw, a 90mm TB picked up 14hp on a 331 and made extra power throughout the ENTIRE power band. I expected the 75mm TB to make just as much power until maybe the very top of the powerband. Here's the article from dyno proven small block ford performance:
     
  12. 84Ttop

    84Ttop
    Expand Collapse
    They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
    SN Certified Technician Mod Dude

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,071
    Likes Received:
    1,942
    Trophy Points:
    154
    Location:
    South Jersey
    Sounds kind of Kinky......
     
    Grabbin' Asphalt likes this.
  13. Grabbin' Asphalt

    Grabbin' Asphalt
    Expand Collapse
    Mustang Master

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Messages:
    2,027
    Likes Received:
    296
    Trophy Points:
    104
    Location:
    Atlanta, Ga
    Gettin' Fresh with a 5.0 :cool:
     
  14. revhead347

    revhead347
    Expand Collapse
    I have face herpes.

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2004
    Messages:
    6,659
    Likes Received:
    303
    Trophy Points:
    124
    Location:
    Acworth, GA
    Kinky is the way I go. I have a 70mm tb, and I think it's actually a 77mm maf. Vacuum is 0 in the intake all the way to the red line with 192cc heads. I'm sure it would be 0 with 205cc heads.

    Kurt
     
  15. FastDriver

    FastDriver
    Expand Collapse
    Mustang Master

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2001
    Messages:
    3,059
    Likes Received:
    217
    Trophy Points:
    84
    Location:
    Xenia, OH
    Kurt, what do you make of the article posted?
     
  16. CT Grim

    CT Grim
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2013
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    19
    Location:
    Tucson, AZ
    My understanding is that I'm limiting my ultimate HP/TQ potential with the Ecam and the tubular GT40. The intake will stay, but the cam might find it's way back on my shelf if picking a new custom/off the shelf cam is worth the $$$. What cams would work best with my set up, and what kind of improvement could be expected?
    Thanks again,
    -Jeff
     
  17. Noobz347

    Noobz347
    Expand Collapse
    Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
    Admin Dude

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 1985
    Messages:
    15,793
    Likes Received:
    1,758
    Trophy Points:
    174
    Location:
    Box behind Walmart
    I like these kinds of discussions.


    *lurking*
     
  18. Grabbin' Asphalt

    Grabbin' Asphalt
    Expand Collapse
    Mustang Master

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Messages:
    2,027
    Likes Received:
    296
    Trophy Points:
    104
    Location:
    Atlanta, Ga
    I suggest the XE264R-12 and you should be 300rwhp+ with good streetability, this is the cam I want!!!! :cheers:
     
    #38 Grabbin' Asphalt, Sep 21, 2013
    Last edited: Sep 21, 2013
  19. FastDriver

    FastDriver
    Expand Collapse
    Mustang Master

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2001
    Messages:
    3,059
    Likes Received:
    217
    Trophy Points:
    84
    Location:
    Xenia, OH
    .55x/.560 lift; 224/228@.050"; 111LSA,

    That was my custom with AFRs and a Cobra intake.
     
  20. CT Grim

    CT Grim
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2013
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    19
    Location:
    Tucson, AZ
    One more thing pondering is to port my intake. It might already have been worked on. Is there an easy way to tell? I will post some pictures later today. Just curious what kind of gains I could hope for.