1low03gt
Dirt-Old 20+Year Member
Running a cleveland wouldn't be different then running a windsor. There is kits out there to run this conversion in a fox mustang, and basically everything chassis wise that fits a fox, will fit the SN95+.
What would make this expensive is if one would be starting from scratch with the cleveland. Seeing that this part is covered, basically all you need is the kmember, and trans brace, the conversion headers designed for the fox chassis, a 94/95 SN95 wiring harness with cluster, run your own fuel system, and trans of your choise really, the cleveland shares the exact same bellhousing bolt pattern as the 5.0, and 5.8. The stock driveshaft will work, but you will need to change the yoke to the '00, and earlier style, but that also depends on the transmision you decide to run. One thing i'm not sure of is the hydroboost, it might have to be swapped out to the earlier style of braking. ..... not too sure on this.
Lots of guys out there have done the 5.0/5.8 conversion in modular stangs, the cleveland is really no different.
But no matter how you look at it. Money will need to be spent LOL!
What would make this expensive is if one would be starting from scratch with the cleveland. Seeing that this part is covered, basically all you need is the kmember, and trans brace, the conversion headers designed for the fox chassis, a 94/95 SN95 wiring harness with cluster, run your own fuel system, and trans of your choise really, the cleveland shares the exact same bellhousing bolt pattern as the 5.0, and 5.8. The stock driveshaft will work, but you will need to change the yoke to the '00, and earlier style, but that also depends on the transmision you decide to run. One thing i'm not sure of is the hydroboost, it might have to be swapped out to the earlier style of braking. ..... not too sure on this.
Lots of guys out there have done the 5.0/5.8 conversion in modular stangs, the cleveland is really no different.
But no matter how you look at it. Money will need to be spent LOL!