Fox or SN95 is more stable at high Speed

[revedup]

The stabiler of the two at high speed?
The Fox or the SN95 stock wise???
Looking for a replacement for my old 5.0. 1989
Maybe a lower mileage fox or Sn95?
Stock for Stock the better overall??
Opinions comments recomendations thanx

 

[Tim2002GT]

I've owned both an '89GT and now an '02GT and I would definately say the '02 feels alot tighter and stable during acceleration and at higher speeds.

 

[four six]

+1 for sn95. They feel ALOT more stable at higher speeds

 

[spitfirees20]

isn't the sn-95 platform based off of and an improved version of the fox platform?

 

[DTNODYA]

SN95!

Many fox's I've been in at high speeds had rattles and stuff that was sketchy.

 

[03ghoststang]

isn't the sn-95 platform based off of and an improved version of the fox platform?

they are but its a platform they used form 79'- 04'

 

[Crzyhrse]

I took my '93 GT up to 130 one time. It shook so bad I never did that again.

 

[tomustang]

full length subframes... either way

just becasue a car rattles doesn't mean it's unstable, we had a 86 GT with sensatracs on it that ran good between 50-90mph

 

[Mel96GT]

Foxes are cool, but they are aerodynamic as a brick. My bone-stock 96 GT did fine at 120+ mph, surprisingly stable. Part of it is due to a stiffened platform which is why SN-95's are heavier and they are more streamlined.

 

[tag4car]

i had a chance to try a top speed run on a closed road and was radar clocked @146, i swear to you the chin spoiler adds the best feeling of frontal downforce in the world

 

[mity2]

isn't the sn-95 platform based off of and an improved version of the fox platform?

This is true, but SN95 have far better areodynamics