rudeone707
New Member
so basically what this thread come down to is that if you own an fbody and you post in a mustang 94-95 tech forum about an fbody, u have to be an idiot.
95snoozer said:would that be a little yellow 331 turbo saleen clone
rudeone707 said:so basically what this thread come down to is that if you own an fbody and you post in a mustang 94-95 tech forum about an fbody, u have to be an idiot.
LPE Z CONVT said:you started arguing lt1s versus ls1 supremacy. this is where the argumnent started. You threw out ignorant and poor examples to prove your incorrect point. You got calle don it by someone who knows more than you on the subject and has more exposure to the ls1 world.
You in turn after realizing you had no rebuttle tried to attack the very people's cars who know more than you about the ls1 lts potential..
Poor examples to prove my incorrect point Please ... I am also a member of all the sites you listed plus others... Because you list a few cars that made over 400rwhp means you know more than me I didn't rebut your claims because i could care less about LS1s .. If i had one i would rebut your words...I know many people that have Ls1/LS6 cars and some make good#s some don't.... I also agree with you about my buddies car on the low #s but he needs an intake.... A friend of mine had the same g5x2 in a 02z28 and went 11.80@120mph... Most cam only LS1s make between 300 rwhp to low 400s rwhp and heads add a little more maybe in mid 400s....Bottom line is you have your veiw points and i have mine .... The thread was posted to let a few people know how my car did ... We spoke in a thread earlier this year before any track times or dyno times not to start a flame war .. You attacked i responded this is my last response.. Good Luck with your cars...
Killercanary said:I couldn't be happier with how my little stock bottom end 302 runs with my nearly 3700lb raceweight. I agree with snoozer though, the lighter the weight the better for all the reasons he listed. I wish mine was lighter.
LPE Z CONVT said:you started arguing lt1s versus ls1 supremacy. this is where the argumnent started. You threw out ignorant and poor examples to prove your incorrect point. You got calle don it by someone who knows more than you on the subject and has more exposure to the ls1 world.
You in turn after realizing you had no rebuttle tried to attack the very people's cars who know more than you about the ls1 lts potential..
Poor examples to prove my incorrect point Please ... I am also a member of all the sites you listed plus others... Because you list a few cars that made over 400rwhp means you know more than me I didn't rebut your claims because i could care less about LS1s .. If i had one i would rebut your words...I know many people that have Ls1/LS6 cars and some make good#s some don't.... I also agree with you about my buddies car on the low #s but he needs an intake.... A friend of mine had the same g5x2 in a 02z28 and went 11.80@120mph... Most cam only LS1s make between 300 rwhp to low 400s rwhp and heads add a little more maybe in mid 400s....Bottom line is you have your veiw points and i have mine .... The thread was posted to let a few people know how my car did ... We spoke in a thread earlier this year before any track times or dyno times not to start a flame war .. You attacked i responded this is my last response.. Good Luck with your cars...
you couldnt be farther from the truth.Grn92LX said:I guess your not very diverse, huh?