blksn955.o
Founding Member
One thing I always seem to remember about the mustang/f-body debate.
If you look at the avg. cars threwout this debate (excluding the zl1, copo, and 429 stuff). The mustang has in most cases had less power or close to the same power. You look at track times and the mustang generally has about the same or better 1/4 numbers.
In the late 60's early 70's the mustang was a very good runner for what it had and with alittle mods woke up nice (from what I hear from older guys...no offense grady)
The fox's straight up dominated the chevy's year for year, the 94-95 was chevy's win, and the 96-98 DOHC mustangs were close with the 99+4v's running just as many low 13's as the ls guys...then the 03-04's had no compitition and were even badder.
Then killed chevy in sales with less power
In the end I like to say "doing more with less for 40+ yrs".
P.S. I am not really one to be the "Ford only" or "die hard Chevy guy" or insane "mopar nut". I like all of them...just ford alittle more.
If you look at the avg. cars threwout this debate (excluding the zl1, copo, and 429 stuff). The mustang has in most cases had less power or close to the same power. You look at track times and the mustang generally has about the same or better 1/4 numbers.
In the late 60's early 70's the mustang was a very good runner for what it had and with alittle mods woke up nice (from what I hear from older guys...no offense grady)
The fox's straight up dominated the chevy's year for year, the 94-95 was chevy's win, and the 96-98 DOHC mustangs were close with the 99+4v's running just as many low 13's as the ls guys...then the 03-04's had no compitition and were even badder.
Then killed chevy in sales with less power
In the end I like to say "doing more with less for 40+ yrs".
P.S. I am not really one to be the "Ford only" or "die hard Chevy guy" or insane "mopar nut". I like all of them...just ford alittle more.