I agreeMay be wrong but it feels ohhh so right
I caved and went to taco bell for lunch, and it was delicious.
1000 apologies. I figured you already had lunch..No love here?
3.27-3.55? Where does that come from? Or are we just disregarding the possibility of different powerbands?IMO gears should be tayloring the power band and in between 3.08 -3:55, on the 3.08-3.27 side for power adders and 3.27- 3.55 side for high compression n/a motors
I have the same except stock heads and the mighty e camLet me just say for the record, we have gone three pages and jrichker has not said removing smog equipment. Ful
One more- driving with skinnies on a DD. (done it)
Looking at this list, just scratching my head as I have on my car
- shorty headers
- U/D pulleys
- CAI
- 3.73's
- no smog equipment
- Gt40 heads/intake but stock cam with 1.7 RR
Cold Air intakes, 24lb injectors/MAF, 6AL boxes, shorty headers, throttle body spacers, doing either intake/cam/heads without doing the other 2. Under drive pulleys
I've done almost all of these in the past. Each one was stupid in it's own special way and amounted to a lot of wasted time. Live and learn
10-15 years ago before hci kits were widely available and affordable I think gears were a good option. Now that we can bolt 75-100hp on to our cars in a weekend on a variety of ways I think gears should be one of the last things done.Glad to see Im not the only one who thinks throwing in a steep gear can have more downsides than up, feel like Im going crazy sometimes reading all the comments saying gears are the one and only first mod any mustang owner needs to do.
IMO first mod should be subframes.
benefits? Sure. Worth the money? No.What about TB? Is this worth it?
Ive got GT40p, stock cam, 73MAF. Would a bigger than stock TB have any ill effects? Any benefits that make it worthwhile?