codyGT said:IMO 4.10 suck and make a nice car feel like junk. I have raced a GT w/4.10's and was unimpressed.
codyGT said:Why do all of the 4.10 lovers think that 3.27s suck so bad?
My 1991 GT had 2.73 w/5-speed only option was 3.08. One of my LT1's had 3.23 and another 2.73.
I myself would rather have 3.55 or 3.73 in my GT.
IMO 4.10 suck and make a nice car feel like junk. I have raced a GT w/4.10's and was unimpressed.
Tylerb59 said:Gear installs cost way to much money out here.
I wouldn't put in 3.55s for the average amount of $700 installed here in the Seattle area. I'm going to have my 4.10s installed soon with 31 spline axles and have to bite the bullet.
FallenPhoenix said:$700!?
crew_dawg16 said:
4.10s or 4.30s
Your shifting quicker because your moving quicker. Whats junk about that.codyGT said:The tires on a older mustang are taller than a new one.
And the reason I say feel like junk is due to how much/quick you shift and the rpms you maintain at certain speeds.
codyGT said:You sure aren't moving quicker. You are reving out faster, that doesn't mean you are moving quicker.
codyGT said:Well that might be true to a point. But just because you are going through gears like a mad man doesn't mean that the car with 4.10 will be faster.
It's the same reason my SS will kill a Mach1, it's even right off the line but I can run my gears out longer and pull hard.
The soulution to everything isn't 4.10's.
codyGT said:Well that might be true to a point. But just because you are going through gears like a mad man doesn't mean that the car with 4.10 will be faster.