Blue coyote
Founding Member
And I just realised something about "Karman".....He's a moron with 6 whole posts, and he decides to slag on the guys who have the Mustangs that look the most like the one he doesn't even have yet
Blue coyote said:And I just realised something about "Karman".....He's a moron with 6 whole posts, and he decides to slag on the guys who have the Mustangs that look the most like the one he doesn't even have yet
karman said:SO THE '65 289 THAT USED TO SIT IN MY DRIVEWAY DOESN'T COUNT HUH!!
MY NUMBER OF POSTS IS MORE IMPORTANT THAT 30 YEARS OF DRIVING AND MECHANICAL EXPERIENCE !!!
Look, sometimes the truth hurts.
Blue coyote said:And I just realised something about "Karman".....He's a moron with 6 whole posts, and he decides to slag on the guys who have the Mustangs that look the most like the one he doesn't even have yet
karman said:SO THE '65 289 THAT USED TO SIT IN MY DRIVEWAY DOESN'T COUNT HUH!! MY NUMBER OF POSTS IS MORE IMPORTANT THAT 30 YEARS OF DRIVING AND MECHANICAL EXPERIENCE !!!
Look, sometimes the truth hurts. I understand that people like the Pinto II. I knew people back in the day who loved them. That didn't stop my buddy's GM cars from trampling them. You can build any car into anything, but the stock Mustang II was a bad handling underpowered vehicle.
karman said:SO THE '65 289 THAT USED TO SIT IN MY DRIVEWAY DOESN'T COUNT HUH!!
MY NUMBER OF POSTS IS MORE IMPORTANT THAT 30 YEARS OF DRIVING AND MECHANICAL EXPERIENCE !!!
Look, sometimes the truth hurts.
I understand that people like the Pinto II. I knew people back in the day who loved them.
That didn't stop my buddy's GM cars from trampling them.
You can build any car into anything, but the stock Mustang II was a bad handling underpowered vehicle.
MadMark said:Use to.
JEEEZZ, I would bet you all felt like big girlie men after you camaros trampled over some old lady's pintokarman said:SO THE '65 289 THAT USED TO SIT IN MY DRIVEWAY DOESN'T COUNT HUH!! MY NUMBER OF POSTS IS MORE IMPORTANT THAT 30 YEARS OF DRIVING AND MECHANICAL EXPERIENCE !!!
Look, sometimes the truth hurts. I understand that people like the Pinto II. I knew people back in the day who loved them. That didn't stop my buddy's GM cars from trampling them. You can build any car into anything, but the stock Mustang II was a bad handling underpowered vehicle.
itsaMustangtoo said:AND-- how comes nobody is ripping on the VEGA--
karman said:That didn't stop my buddy's GM cars from trampling them. You can build any car into anything, but the stock Mustang II was a bad handling underpowered vehicle.
I'd call you a tool, but those are generally useful.karman said:SO THE '65 289 THAT USED TO SIT IN MY DRIVEWAY DOESN'T COUNT HUH!! MY NUMBER OF POSTS IS MORE IMPORTANT THAT 30 YEARS OF DRIVING AND MECHANICAL EXPERIENCE !!!
Look, sometimes the truth hurts. I understand that people like the Pinto II. I knew people back in the day who loved them. That didn't stop my buddy's GM cars from trampling them. You can build any car into anything, but the stock Mustang II was a bad handling underpowered vehicle.
MadMark said:Astounding, isn't it?
It's almost like he thinks he's the first dumbass to waunder in here and try busting on the II.
He should go back to whatever circle jerk he strayed from.
karman said:Now I know how you got so many posts. Random bashing of people's personal opinions. DID ANYONE READ THE PART THAT SAID I DON'T HATE THE CAR?????!!!!!! I JUST DON'T THINK IT IS EVER GOING TO BE A "PACKARD" COLLECTOR CAR.
karman said:Rare? Sort of . The difference is that the Packard was an excellent and powerful car for it's day and still has style. The Pinto II was an inferior car in every respect even for it's day and in it's day I used to blow them off on a regular basis with my stock Plymouth Valiant (oh yes the Cobras and the V6). 30 years from now, the Mustang II will command values which will allow an entry level collector to start a collection.
10 years after that he will be able to sell it for what he paid for it.
Don't get me wrong, I don't hate the car (although we did make fun of them back in the day), it just will never be a sought after car like a Packard.
karman said:SO THE '65 289 THAT USED TO SIT IN MY DRIVEWAY DOESN'T COUNT HUH!! MY NUMBER OF POSTS IS MORE IMPORTANT THAT 30 YEARS OF DRIVING AND MECHANICAL EXPERIENCE !!!
Look, sometimes the truth hurts. I understand that people like the Pinto II. I knew people back in the day who loved them. That didn't stop my buddy's GM cars from trampling them. You can build any car into anything, but the stock Mustang II was a bad handling underpowered vehicle.
4u2nv said:Despite your distaste for the Fox, sales figures and its production tenure tell a contrary story with reference to its popularity.
karman said:Now I know how you got so many posts. Random bashing of people's personal opinions. DID ANYONE READ THE PART THAT SAID I DON'T HATE THE CAR?????!!!!!! I JUST DON'T THINK IT IS EVER GOING TO BE A "PACKARD" COLLECTOR CAR.