The "CAI" is NOT a "performance" modification.

Discussion in 'Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech' started by DMAN302, May 4, 2005.

  1. bryanrevans

    bryanrevans New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2004
    Messages:
    296
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Chicopee,Mass
    I dont give a dukey I like how it looks!!!!!
     
    #21
  2. DMAN302

    DMAN302 My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2003
    Messages:
    2,394
    Likes Received:
    99
    Trophy Points:
    59
    Location:
    windsor, Canada
    Ah see this is why I decided to post this topic..I would LOVE to find a product that works over my stock system..but would have to be proven. I will take a look at the AMF, but I'm still cynical. Since going from a 65mm to a 70mm TB yeilded no gain in terms of performance for my vehicle I can stand by my statement that the stock inlet provides more than adequate air "volume" for a 302 N/A set up.
     
    #22
  3. bluevenom867

    bluevenom867 I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2003
    Messages:
    1,727
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    St.Petersburg,FL
    "Gain Up To 20hp From One Of Are Cold Air Induction Kits!!!"*












    *A 20hp gain was reliezed on a 5.0 mustang with a sandwitch bag over the stock +100,000mile airfilter, compared to ours w/ K&N filter
     
    #23
  4. UnderPressureGT

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    2,299
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    TR- Jersey Shore
    www.andersonfordmotorsport.com
     
    #24
  5. willys1

    willys1 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2003
    Messages:
    2,557
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    New Jersey
    :lol: :lol: :lol:
     
    #25
  6. bluevenom867

    bluevenom867 I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2003
    Messages:
    1,727
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    St.Petersburg,FL
    They do work,they may drop the temps down maybe 10 to 20 degrees depnding on the material and size of the tubing,which is a solid 5-6hp.
     
    #26
  7. mustangramair

    mustangramair Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2004
    Messages:
    323
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    17
    Location:
    Iowa
    I agree that a CAI isn't a great performance mod, but i also don't see anything wrong with putting it in your signature. There isn't anything wrong with being proud of something you put on your car even if it just makes your engine look nicer. I guess everyone has to start somewhere.
     
    #27
  8. 04sleeper

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2002
    Messages:
    2,689
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    49
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    Yes. Like this.
    [​IMG]

    I have one if you are interested willy. PM me or let me know.

    Or you can go to http://www.andersonfordmotorsport.com/pipes/pipes-50.html
     
    #28
  9. DMAN302

    DMAN302 My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2003
    Messages:
    2,394
    Likes Received:
    99
    Trophy Points:
    59
    Location:
    windsor, Canada
    I would enjoy testing this "snail" intake your speaking of...does anyone have one of these laying around..I would love to try one. Thanks JT for the support, I just love stirring it up now and then. Fact is the "standard" CAI like the BBK/MAC/UPR is nothing more than a company ass grab to take advantage of the unknowing..I think the false claims stink..just not right. Perhaps as stated the AFM inlet works, but I just don't see any "true" gains to justify the price.
     
    #29
  10. DMAN302

    DMAN302 My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2003
    Messages:
    2,394
    Likes Received:
    99
    Trophy Points:
    59
    Location:
    windsor, Canada
    I for one think they look FANTASTIC..if not for worry about problems it MAY create with my cars performance, I would in no way be opposed to having one in place. Hell your talkin to the guy who purchased the billet hand brake cover..lol.
     
    #30
  11. 88_GT_5_oh

    88_GT_5_oh Sportin' a turbo 5.0 in Canadistan

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    Messages:
    961
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    WPG/MB/CA
    so what about a wing.. that still adds HP right? or was i lied to again? damn ricer friends
     
    #31
  12. willys1

    willys1 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2003
    Messages:
    2,557
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Yeah,,I just happened to have some of his dyno sheets lying around, :nonono: ,,Im not the one in disbelief,you wanna see,go to his web site and SEE :D I said "12",not 20!! Plus some of that 12hp is from the larger maf!! I cant see 20 either!! Although I see some big gains with the svt Cobra'!!
     
    #32
  13. 04sleeper

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2002
    Messages:
    2,689
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    49
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    Here is your Dyno Graph for all you non-belivers.

    Or just ask Rick 91GT .
    [​IMG]
     
    #33
  14. bluevenom867

    bluevenom867 I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2003
    Messages:
    1,727
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    St.Petersburg,FL
    Of course it adds hp silly :p

    Its placed on the back so its superior to thous "front" engine modes because you get instant rwhp,skiping the normal front hp gain and giving you only rwhp.

    :D :D
     
    #34
  15. mackey

    mackey Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2003
    Messages:
    1,444
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Beverly, Massachusetts
    A K&N Cold Air Intake is worth a few psi on 03-04 cobras and they net big gains... I say they are a modification. Especially for the price we pay, they better be considered a modification.
     
    #35
  16. willys1

    willys1 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2003
    Messages:
    2,557
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    New Jersey
    #36
  17. 88_GT_5_oh

    88_GT_5_oh Sportin' a turbo 5.0 in Canadistan

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    Messages:
    961
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    WPG/MB/CA

    whew... glad the previous owner did the "wing swap" for me :nice:
     
    #37
  18. willys1

    willys1 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2003
    Messages:
    2,557
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    New Jersey
    :p :p :p :p :p :p
     
    #38
  19. vristang

    vristang Advanced Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    4,671
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    69
    Location:
    Seattle
    None of my comments were meant for any one person. :D

    I pose the challenge to everyone (both believers and naysayers), to post dyno sheets. Otherwise old wives tales will continue to prosper, turning us all into dumb ricers:(
     
    #39
  20. oohsoobad2

    oohsoobad2 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2004
    Messages:
    129
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I agree that a cold air is mostly just a show piece. However there is nothing wrong with listing it as a performance mod, Id bet even the worst cold air kit is worth one or two HP over stock just because of the free flowing filter.
    I personally skipped the cold air and added a replacement K&N filter, I dont list it as one of my mods, but it did drop .10 and added 1.5 MPH in the quarter mile.
     
    #40

Share This Page