pinski
Founding Member
Jon Do said:I did show respect for the Mustang but then I got tired of the **** talking at this place. The bottom line is that I realize the Mustang is not for me. Maybe if I was a 17 year old highschool kid looking for cheap wheels, but not now.
Then why are you here? If you stir up sh1t like you have, expect this as a result! Not that complicated.
If I went over to LS1.com and started talking about how fantastic the Mustang is, and how it put the F-bodies out of their misery, do you think I would be well-received? Hell no. If you want to stay here and learn, fine. If not, GO AWAY!
Btw, I'm always up for a quick engine comparo:
Ford
4.6L 2v N/A
HP - 260
HP/Liter - 56.5
4.6L 3v N/A
HP - 300
HP/Liter - 65.2
4.6L 4v N/A
HP - 320
HP/Liter - 69.6
4.6L 4v FI
HP - 390
HP/Liter - 84.8
vs. GM
5.7L LS1
HP - 350
HP/Liter - 61.4
*oopsie, the 4.6L 3v is better!
5.7L LS6
HP - 405
HP/Liter - 71.1
*oh noes, a teeny 4.6L with a blower stomps it!
6.0L LS2
HP - 400
HP/Liter - 66.7
*still not as good as the 4.6L 4v NA motor Ford stopped using after the 2001 Cobra
7.0L LS7
HP - 500
HP/Liter - 71.4
*barely better than the LS6, still way behind the current Cobra, and will be even FURTHER behind the next-gen Cobra.
The point: Ford does more with less, if the mighty LS1 was only 4.6 liters, it would only make 282.4hp, not even as good as the 2005 Mustang GT.