66Camaro454
New Member
- May 22, 2004
- 25
- 0
- 0
man none of u kno ur 5oh's the SAAC mk 1 came with a N/A gt40 engine platform that had 295 hp in other words the fastest production 5oh
D347643 said:haha 86 wasnt cfi dude.
87'GTstang said:And no it wasn't, it was the first year of SEFI and they had a "turbo swirl" head design that was good for torque but crapped out on the hp department.
66Camaro454 said:man none of u kno ur 5oh's the SAAC mk 1 came with a N/A gt40 engine platform that had 295 hp in other words the fastest production 5oh
87-88 sd NOTCHBACK mustangs would run the fastest etsJs5ohLX said:It would be 87-88 they are SD, the fastest stock. 86 was choked by the intake, 87-93 were choked by the mass air.
89MustangGX said:Do you not get the fact that Ford didn't produce those cars? They didn't roll out of the Ford factory that way -- so it's not a Ford production car. It's like comparing a Saleen to a GT and saying Ford made the Saleens faster.
87'GTstang said:True, but it wasn't the fastest 5.0/302 produced from the factory. I still don't like throwing that into the comparison for one reason, from 87-93' sales of the 5.0-backed stangs was over 500,000 while the cobra and cobra R combined topped out at 5,100
Sir Hacksalot said:Don't forget, that Ford changed the method that they measured HP in 1993, and that the 5.0 was actually rated at 205 HP, not 225 HP, even though it was essentially the same engine.
Hax
66Camaro454 said:well its a shelby car that ford asked to b made, ur guna tell me a 67 shelby gt350 isnt a production stang
66Camaro454 said:if it wasnt for the saac there wouldnt b a cobra in 93 much less the R
LT1Killa said:Lx too, not Gt.